| Should
We Deny Communion to Dissenters on Church Teachings?
Spirit and Life Video Email
for Friday, May 11, 2007
Hello again.
I am Fr. Tom Euteneuer, President of Human Life International, and
welcome to this final segment of the Spirit and Life mini-series
on contraception.
Today we address
the issue of whether to deny Communion to those who dissent on Church
teaching. While I won’t attempt to say everything that could
be said on the subject—I’ve posted more resources on
this matter on the sidebar of this email—the basic answer
is “Yes.” And the reason is very simple: Those who are
not in communion should not receive Communion. That is
fundamentally the position of our Church.
In order to
receive Communion in the Catholic Church you have to manifest three
types of union with the Church: the first is social union
which means that you have to actually be a member of the
Church. There are some provisions of canon law that allow the reception
of Communion for the Orthodox, but by and large, membership in the
Catholic Church is required.
The second type
of union is spiritual union: namely, you must both be in
a state of grace and must actually believe that what you
receive is the Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus. This
is why Protestants are not free to receive Communion because they
do not have this Eucharistic faith.
The third type
of union is doctrinal union. That is, if you do not believe
all that the Catholic Church professes to be “true
and worthy of belief,” then you are not in full union
with the Church and should not receive Communion. We are not free
to believe only part of Church doctrine or only those things
that happen to be fashionable or convenient. Church teaching is
one comprehensive package of truth which must be accepted in its
entirety.
What happens
if someone in a high profile position dissents on clearly-defined
teaching of the Church?
Well, in a 2004
letter to the American bishops entitled appropriately “Worthiness
to Receive Communion,” then-Cardinal Ratzinger said that even
a Eucharistic minister can deny Communion to someone in a situation
of “obstinate persistence in manifest grave sin.” He
cites canon 915 and other church documents to support this position.
As Jesus, he
exhorts the priests of the Church to first address these situations
in private, but if such people continue to obstinately
reject Church teachings, they must be denied Communion. This is
a call to basic honesty.
If it is question
of a private person whose dissent or lifestyle is mortally sinful
and causing scandal, then the same duty of confronting the person
in private remains. Charity requires us to give the benefit of the
doubt to the individual when there is ambiguity about a sinful life
or practice; yet, some situations of mortal sin are very clear and
can be verified externally such as:
- Cohabitation
or illicit marriage
- Doctors
who prescribe contraception to their patients
- People who
work in immoral industries like abortion, pornography and the
like.
We cannot be
neutral about the profanation of the Eucharist if we have certain
knowledge of clear violations or scandal.
Priests and
bishops have the very first responsibility of guarding the Eucharist
from abuse, but I believe that we all have the obligation to call
people to basic honesty and accountability for their Faith.
Again, those
who are not in communion should not receive Communion. It really
is that simple.
My friends,
in a few weeks I intend to publish the whole Spirit and Life
mini-series on contraception in audio and DVD format, and I
hope you will order it and use it for the ongoing work of evangelizing
our culture. Thanks again for forwarding this video message to those
who may need to hear it.
Church Militant—Keep
up the good fight for the soul of our nation—and our Church!
God bless you!
Copyright
2007. Human Life International. Permission
granted for unlimited use. Credit required.
|